Post by Arata "Kesshi" Itonami on May 16, 2013 16:09:01 GMT -5
THE 4 FORUMS OF AUTO'ING.
There are 4 forms of Auto'ing in the T1, which is the format we use in AirG.
#1. The most crucial an ... d typical form of Auto'ing is dictating any section of space-time that would interfere with the opponent existence without giving an equal opportunity to do the same or intervene. {Ie: Stating that you grabbed your opponent without stating it was an attempt. Or completely controlling someone else's character.}
#2. The other form of Auto'ing that relates to the one above, is dictating the fabric of space-time in travel, without giving your Foe equal opportunities to do the same, and dictating the fabric of space-time without stating that you applied a state of travel along that continuum. {Ie; His sinistral hand led in a chop in route for the opponents neck == or how most would detail; "toward" or "at" the target}
#3. The 3rd Forum of Auto'ing is skipping essential steps. By just missing a single step in your technique, it could invalidate anything you state ahead of that. {Ie: With a katana on his left hip, he slashes. . .} Without stating that you Drew your weapon, the unsheathing becomes invalid. Therefore, causing the swing to never happen. In terms of Mentally manipulating existence, {Ie: An empyrean conscious focus on a nearby river, a stream of water, shaped like a serpent, rise. . .} The ability would become invalid because the process of forming such shape, and/or and additional forms of measurements, were not stated. Since such step was missed, the Shape's state would be an Auto.
#4. The last; but hopefully not least, in the forums of Autoing, is using an ability or technique that you have no rea, or authentic knowledge of. {Ie: If you say your character is manipulating Fire in battle, and attempts astronomical temperatures, with no real knowledge about precision, stability or function of such temperature, How can the character that You control, know something You don't? } By all means of moral and ethical values, the bounds of the two would be "Uneven" and cannot Phase together for a true validation which makes it an Auto.
There are 4 forms of Auto'ing in the T1, which is the format we use in AirG.
#1. The most crucial an ... d typical form of Auto'ing is dictating any section of space-time that would interfere with the opponent existence without giving an equal opportunity to do the same or intervene. {Ie: Stating that you grabbed your opponent without stating it was an attempt. Or completely controlling someone else's character.}
#2. The other form of Auto'ing that relates to the one above, is dictating the fabric of space-time in travel, without giving your Foe equal opportunities to do the same, and dictating the fabric of space-time without stating that you applied a state of travel along that continuum. {Ie; His sinistral hand led in a chop in route for the opponents neck == or how most would detail; "toward" or "at" the target}
#3. The 3rd Forum of Auto'ing is skipping essential steps. By just missing a single step in your technique, it could invalidate anything you state ahead of that. {Ie: With a katana on his left hip, he slashes. . .} Without stating that you Drew your weapon, the unsheathing becomes invalid. Therefore, causing the swing to never happen. In terms of Mentally manipulating existence, {Ie: An empyrean conscious focus on a nearby river, a stream of water, shaped like a serpent, rise. . .} The ability would become invalid because the process of forming such shape, and/or and additional forms of measurements, were not stated. Since such step was missed, the Shape's state would be an Auto.
#4. The last; but hopefully not least, in the forums of Autoing, is using an ability or technique that you have no rea, or authentic knowledge of. {Ie: If you say your character is manipulating Fire in battle, and attempts astronomical temperatures, with no real knowledge about precision, stability or function of such temperature, How can the character that You control, know something You don't? } By all means of moral and ethical values, the bounds of the two would be "Uneven" and cannot Phase together for a true validation which makes it an Auto.